Muziek Centrum Nederland

In the spotlight

Mastering Berg

How Otto Ketting de-Berged Berg


By: Bas van Putten | 13 December 2010 | 7:15

Translation: Hilary Staples

Otto_Ketting_photo_Teo-Krijgsman

Otto Ketting (1935) was 24 years old when he completed his First Symphony in 1959. The music exudes confidence and it is evident who inspired him: Alban Berg. Or rather, Ketting’s view of Berg: an example and challenge.

Just one movement, less than 20 minutes. Listen to the beginning, how attractively it is orchestrated, slow and quiet, just like the end of the work. A faint rumbling in the percussion; low rattling brass; sparkling stray notes in the harp and the celesta; absent-minded solos in the woodwinds, disconnectedly singing strings, muted trumpets. Listen later in the work to the quasi parodying tone in the brass, the expressionistic dynamism of the climaxes – Berg! Just like comparisons to Mahler were made at the premiere of Alban Berg’s complete Drei Orchesterstücke Op. 6, nobody could miss the influence of Berg in Ketting’s First Symphony.

Flash is required!
O. Ketting: Symphony No. 1 excerpt from opening; Concertgebouw Orchestra, Hans Rosbaud cond. (recorded 1980)
Flash is required!
O. Ketting: Symphony No. 1 excerpt 2; Concertgebouw Orchestra, Hans Rosbaud cond. (recorded 1980)
Flash is required!
O. Ketting: Symphony No. 1, excerpt final part; Concertgebouw Orchestra, Hans Rosbaud cond. (recorded 1980)

That is, if one assumes that the listener from around 1960 was familiar with the music of the Second Viennese School – and in those days there were not a great many in the Netherlands. This is why Ketting’s First Symphony was a milestone in its genre. While in the international avant-garde dodecaphony and serialism were rapidly gaining ground, the atonal works by Arnold Schoenberg, Anton Webern, Alban Berg and their successors were looked upon with great suspicion by the conservative Dutch music scene. In 1956 the performance of Schoenberg’s Violin Concerto in Amsterdam caused a commotion. Just like everywhere else he was already controversial here in the Netherlands. In the 1930s the at the time ubiquitous Willem Pijper labelled Schoenberg an ‘in essence’ destructive force. Thus expressing an opinion that did not stimulate his many pupils – some of them dominated Dutch music life in the 1950s – to embrace dodecaphony. At best people were only moderately modern. The fact that Pijper did consider Webern a master did not have any repercussions for Dutch music.

Twelve-note technique considered a historical necessity
Or maybe it did: Pijper’s pupil Kees van Baaren certainly was encouraged by his teacher to continue his dodecaphonic explorations. And it was van Baaren who, as a composition teacher at the Conservatories of Utrecht and The Hague, made the twelve-note technique the basis of his curriculum. He became the influential tutor of a group of musicians all born in or around 1935, that as composers, performing artists and activists drastically reformed music life. Peter Schat, Louis Andriessen, Jan van Vlijmen, Reinbert de Leeuw and Misha Mengelberg – none of them escaped the teachings that van Baaren considered a historical necessity. In the late-1950s Schat, Andriessen and van Vlijmen were converted, although only the latter for the rest of his life. For the first time Dutch music became truly contemporary. The Gaudeamus Music Weeks, organised by Walter Maas in and around the village of Bilthoven, became a meeting place for independent radicals.

Van Baaren did not have a monopoly on the twelve-note technique. At the same time Ton de Leeuw – a pupil of Henk Badings and Olivier Messiaen – went through a serial phase. And so did the perpetual outsider Otto Ketting who, advice from his father Piet Ketting and Louis’ father Hendrik Andriessen aside, never had composition lessons from anybody. But his star rose fast in Gaudeamus circles and beyond.

Ketting had studied the trumpet in The Hague and had for years played in the Residentie Orchestra. He had discovered Schoenberg, Berg and Webern all on his own. Both his passionate plea for Webern in the music periodical Mens en Melodie (1958) and his early works are testimony to this. When in 1960 Ketting received a grant to study in Munich with Karl Amadeus Hartmann, he had already written his Komposition für zwölf Tönen for piano (1956), his Webernian Due Canzoni (1957), his Passacaglia for orchestra (1957) and his First Symphony.

Otto Ketting – Due Canzoni (1957):

Strangely enough Ketting’s First turns out to be less Berg-like than it appeared at the time. Ketting is less fin de siècle, less yearningly Mahlerian, less esoteric. Besides all his passion, there is a kind of professional restraint that shows us that there are two ways of following: imitation and invocation. Imitation is repetition, which can only result in plagiarism. Invocation is processing: pretending to be somebody else in order to find oneself. That is what Ketting appears to do in his First – and not for the last time, as he demonstrates in the ‘Mahler adagio’ of his Third Symphony (1999), where he, to quote Maarten Brandt, ‘un-Mahlers’ Mahler, in the same way he de-Bergs Berg in his First. He outgrows Berg by pulling him towards himself, like the Berg of the Orchesterstücke emancipates from Mahler by getting as near to him as possible. Later Ketting concluded that he ‘got stuck in Berg’, but one could just as easily claim that he shook him off in one go: he had mastered the hero. When in February 1961 conductor Hans Rosbaud combined Ketting’s First with Berg’s Opus 6 in a programme with the Concertgebouw Orchestra, it is unlikely he did this because he thought the works were so similar. Nothing is as personal as fighting one’s demons. ‘Every piece is a self portrait,’ Ketting rightly stated later.

More music?

NTR ZaterdagMatinee
Saturday 15 January 2011, 2:15 p.m.

Concertgebouw Amsterdam, Grote Zaal
Radio Philharmonic Orchestra, Carlo Rizzi conducting, Alina Ibragimova violin

'Music from times of war'
O. Ketting - First Symphony
K.A. Hartmann - Concerto funebre
B. Bartók - Concerto for orchestra

www.concertgebouw.nl

More details?

Portrait of Otto Ketting by Stijn van der Loo (Studio BHH), camera Deen van der Zaken:

The Music encyclopedia on Otto Ketting

Music Information Center
Sheet music, audio, video recordings etc.: by appointment at the MIC, Amsterdam.

 Bas van Putten (1965) is author and musicologist. He writes about music for De Groene Amsterdammer and is working on a biography on Peter Schat.

To top